Instructional design and training is perhaps the equivalent of the crocodile-alligator problem, only in the field of learning and development. They may look the same to the untrained eye. However, closer scrutiny reveals that they have certain differences.

Here are some pointers to help you understand how instructional design and training work in relation to each other:

Instructional Designer vs. Trainer

An instructional designer designs the training programs whereas the trainer delivers them. These two are answers to different functions of learning and development.

It is the instructional designer’s job to devise the instructional interventions required, if any, to close the performance gap. He or she creates a training program based on the analysis and provide guidance in creating and evaluating the results. On the other hand, it is the trainer’s task to impart or relay the knowledge and/or skills necessary to improve the learners’ performance.

The Role of the SME

Another character that we must look into is the subject matter expert (SME). As “authorities” in their fields, SMEs are sometimes tapped to conduct training. In this capacity, the SME becomes a trainer. In the same way, instructional designers are also sometimes asked to implement or facilitate the learning intervention they designed. Thus, they can also function as a trainer.

This is why it is important to distinguish each function to be able to set proper expectations and maximize what each can bring to the table.

In instances where the SME, the instructional designer, and the trainer are exclusive functions, the three must work closely to ensure the efficiency of the program. In this setup, the instructional designer studies the performance problem and how a learning intervention can help solve it. The SME is the source of content which the instructional designer uses to develop the course, and the trainer delivers the designed learning program.

Trainer-Centric vs. Learner-Centric

In instructional design, being “consistent” does not mean using the same material over and over again. Consistency means the capability to replicate the process and ensure the instructional integrity of the program at all times. Hence, instructional design can adapt to your particular needs by offering to customize instuctions, yet remains consistent at the same time.

Cost-effectiveness

Instructional design simplifies learning for the learners. Through careful planning, it identifies the easiest and most effective way through which learners can get the information and training they need. As a result, the learning process is shortened, objectives are met more easily, and resources are maximized.

---